Search

Servant Leaders not Servant Followers

Robert K. Greenleaf, who coined the term “servant leader,” said that “the

servant-leader is servant first.”

While he certainly meant well and his statement should be seen in the

historical context of the very hierarchical 1970s that it was made in, servant

leadership should be seen more as a dichotomy, with both parts being equally

important, despite appearing to be opposites.

Why do we care about this? Because some Scrum Masters go way too far over

to the servant side. Instead of holding people responsible as any good leader

would do, they discuss feelings incessantly. Instead of relentlessly attacking

impediments, they try to help people deal with the emotional outfall of those

impediments. This is not wrong per se, and the emotional aspect is indeed

essential, but not if it comes at the price of actually leading. Scrum Masters

need to do both, lead and serve!

(From Scaling Done Right Chapter 10)

Recent Posts

See All

Prior to the Scrum Guide 2020, the backlog refinement used to be regarded as a “quasi event” and a lot more was mentioned about it. So, what happened? As we know the Scrum Guide 2020 was “leaned” and

The Scrum Guide states that the Scrum Master is accountable for the Scrum Team’s effectiveness. Improvement is key to effectiveness. Previously, we discussed Scrumming the Scrum. That was all about co