Servant Leaders not Servant Followers

Robert K. Greenleaf, who coined the term “servant leader,” said that “the

servant-leader is servant first.”

While he certainly meant well and his statement should be seen in the

historical context of the very hierarchical 1970s that it was made in, servant

leadership should be seen more as a dichotomy, with both parts being equally

important, despite appearing to be opposites.

Why do we care about this? Because some Scrum Masters go way too far over

to the servant side. Instead of holding people responsible as any good leader

would do, they discuss feelings incessantly. Instead of relentlessly attacking

impediments, they try to help people deal with the emotional outfall of those

impediments. This is not wrong per se, and the emotional aspect is indeed

essential, but not if it comes at the price of actually leading. Scrum Masters

need to do both, lead and serve!

(From Scaling Done Right Chapter 10)